Article View: comp.security.firewalls
Article #119Re: Cuervo, I disagree: ShareSniffer Released
From: Philip J. Koenig
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 03:56
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 03:56
40 lines
3211 bytes
3211 bytes
In article <t5nj9t4vvua0ovclofd9fcidjgfqmjnk2m@4ax.com>, rtoledo@gte.net (rtoledo@gte.net) writes... > On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 15:47:34 GMT, John Navas > <spamfilter@navasgrp.dublin.ca.us> wrote: > > >Nope. A port scan is an attempt to connect (enter). > > > >>Problems arise when users on Network connected machines don't > >>understand or realize that their OS has setup a newstand and is > >>providing some pamphlets and newspapers w/o telling them so. > > > >On the contrary. You are effectively saying that the owner is > >responsible for the burgling of his home if he accidentally leaves the > >back door unlocked. That's blaming the victim. > > If I scan your port 21, HOW am I trying to connect to it? and I know > you know it takes more than that it takes a tcp 21/20 connection where > a user name and a password has to be exchanged before that connection > happens, or is it a trojan going outbound? but then that's internal? > UDP 21? please enlightens us What possibly could be the *point* of scanning that port unless you plan to connect to it? How many people can possibly all be doing "ftp demographic research" at the same time? Makes no sense. Would be tantamount to saying that no one would look dimly upon someone who walks a couple miles down the street checking each house for unlocked doors and when they found an open one, they'd peek in to "see if someone invited me in". -- Philip J. Koenig The Electric Kahuna Organization [anti-spammed] ----------------Computers & Communications for the New Millennium------------- * To send email, remove numbers and spaces: pjkunet64 @ ekahuna27 . com * * Vision impaired? Try taking off the blacklist-colored glasses. * * Simple answers are for simple minds. Try a new way of looking at things. *
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MPG.1504c5509e34e2b98a01e@207.126.101.100>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3A966412.9336DCD8@mynetwatchman.com> <1orc9t0dblf72e35c9vvjj562kfff17vmm@can.gov> <OTul6.2816$L04.327284@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <jtvl6.1306$aA5.364833@typhoon2.ba-dsg.net> <97656j$d8f$2@news.panix.com> <WqBl6.3899$S25.55097@typhoon.sonic.net> <qvig9tobv9597b8fmhp5bohg701i8ftbtk@4ax.com> <qO9m6.4024$S25.60081@typhoon.sonic.net> <t5nj9t4vvua0ovclofd9fcidjgfqmjnk2m@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f922c,b3c453f70036b961 X-Google-Attributes: gidf922c,public X-Google-Thread: 10090f,b3c453f70036b961 X-Google-Attributes: gid10090f,public X-Google-Thread: f5dc1,b3c453f70036b961 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5dc1,public X-Google-Thread: 113850,b3c453f70036b961 X-Google-Attributes: gid113850,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-26 19:57:56 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: See_email_@ddress_below.This_one_is.invalid (Philip J. Koenig) Newsgroups: comp.security.firewalls,bellsouth.net.security,comp.dcom.xdsl,comp.dcom.modems.cable Subject: Re: Cuervo, I disagree: ShareSniffer Released Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:56:35 -0800 Organization: The Ekahuna Organization Message-ID: <MPG.1504c5509e34e2b98a01e@207.126.101.100> References: <3A966412.9336DCD8@mynetwatchman.com> <1orc9t0dblf72e35c9vvjj562kfff17vmm@can.gov> <OTul6.2816$L04.327284@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <jtvl6.1306$aA5.364833@typhoon2.ba-dsg.net> <97656j$d8f$2@news.panix.com> <WqBl6.3899$S25.55097@typhoon.sonic.net> <qvig9tobv9597b8fmhp5bohg701i8ftbtk@4ax.com> <qO9m6.4024$S25.60081@typhoon.sonic.net> <t5nj9t4vvua0ovclofd9fcidjgfqmjnk2m@4ax.com> X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.10 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Lines: 40