Article View: comp.security.firewalls
Article #195Re: Cuervo, I disagree: ShareSniffer Released
From: John Navas
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 22:26
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 22:26
27 lines
2498 bytes
2498 bytes
[POSTED TO comp.dcom.modems.cable; PLEASE REPLY THERE]
I respectfully disagree. Experience shows that education alone is
ineffective.
In <3A96AABA.E5453AF1@mynetwatchman.com>, Lawrence Baldwin
<baldwinlSPAMMENOT@mynetwatchman.com> wrote:
>Agree, solution isn't legislation...it's education.
>Chris Severance wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:37:51 GMT, "Justin Emalius"
>> <notta.name@notta.server.net> wrote:
>>
>> >I see nothing wrong with having my ISP/DSL provider acting to curb malicious
>> >port scanners. I'd also like the U.S. Congress to consider making port
>> >scanning a criminal act.
>>
>> That would accomplish nothing. If anything, providing open ports
>> should be illegal since that can be targeted for punishment. Not that
>> they aren't already.
--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>
CABLE MODEM/DSL GUIDE: <http://Cable-DSL.home.att.net/>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9sBl6.3900$S25.55097@typhoon.sonic.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!typhoon.sonic.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<3A966412.9336DCD8@mynetwatchman.com> <1orc9t0dblf72e35c9vvjj562kfff17vmm@can.gov> <OTul6.2816$L04.327284@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <jtvl6.1306$aA5.364833@typhoon2.ba-dsg.net> <up8d9t44na3m8f50jp1fb2ml9d67tct0om@4ax.com> <3A96AABA.E5453AF1@mynetwatchman.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f922c,b3c453f70036b961 X-Google-Attributes: gidf922c,public X-Google-Thread: 10090f,b3c453f70036b961 X-Google-Attributes: gid10090f,public X-Google-Thread: f5dc1,b3c453f70036b961 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5dc1,public X-Google-Thread: 113850,b3c453f70036b961 X-Google-Attributes: gid113850,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-23 14:28:03 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!typhoon.sonic.net!not-for-mail From: John Navas <spamfilter@navasgrp.dublin.ca.us> Newsgroups: comp.security.firewalls,bellsouth.net.security,comp.dcom.xdsl,comp.dcom.modems.cable Subject: Re: Cuervo, I disagree: ShareSniffer Released Organization: The Navas Group, Dublin, CA, USA References: <3A966412.9336DCD8@mynetwatchman.com> <1orc9t0dblf72e35c9vvjj562kfff17vmm@can.gov> <OTul6.2816$L04.327284@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <jtvl6.1306$aA5.364833@typhoon2.ba-dsg.net> <up8d9t44na3m8f50jp1fb2ml9d67tct0om@4ax.com> <3A96AABA.E5453AF1@mynetwatchman.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 27 Message-ID: <9sBl6.3900$S25.55097@typhoon.sonic.net> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 22:26:13 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.204.185.87 X-Complaints-To: abuse@sonic.net X-Trace: typhoon.sonic.net 982967173 209.204.185.87 (Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:26:13 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:26:13 PST