Article View: comp.security.firewalls
Article #226Re: Cuervo, I disagree: ShareSniffer Released
From: Masked Phrogg
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 00:17
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 00:17
27 lines
2573 bytes
2573 bytes
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 01:28:31 GMT, John Navas <spamfilter@navasgrp.dublin.ca.us> wrote: >> knocking on all 65535 ports(doors) is not an attempt to *break in* >>... > >On the contrary. Your "knock" is actually an attempt to enter (connect) >without authorization. How am I to "ask" entry if I don't knock _first_ ? Your understanding of port scanning is w/o merit. Actual attempts at connection are done by different methods albeit such connections _may_ be directly related to a port scanning effort. Don't throw out the baby w/the bathwater. M Phrogg -=- "I oppose it because I believe individuals need the means to protect their own privacy whether from governments or criminals. We need to find a balance between individual freedom and state authority for (the presumed) general welfare and security. We want security, but there is no security if anyone has too much power." ==Esther Dyson comments to tech.thirsty.com on why the UK's RIP bill is "clueless policy"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<mdjg9tovop2fb15fnf6d3a253fa60ecpe2@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!news-feed.riddles.org.uk!newsengine.sol.net!207.172.3.44.MISMATCH!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!newsfeed.atl!news4.mco.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<3A966412.9336DCD8@mynetwatchman.com> <jtvl6.1306$aA5.364833@typhoon2.ba-dsg.net> <97656j$d8f$2@news.panix.com> <WqBl6.3899$S25.55097@typhoon.sonic.net> <976pnb$jon$2@news.panix.com> <FeCl6.3919$S25.55117@typhoon.sonic.net> <teud9t44k6igkb6q4dknv3sdjienfg2glb@4ax.com> <37El6.3929$S25.55141@typhoon.sonic.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f922c,b3c453f70036b961 X-Google-Attributes: gidf922c,public X-Google-Thread: f5dc1,b3c453f70036b961 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5dc1,public X-Google-Thread: 113850,b3c453f70036b961 X-Google-Attributes: gid113850,public X-Google-Thread: 10090f,b3c453f70036b961 X-Google-Attributes: gid10090f,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-24 13:24:09 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!news-feed.riddles.org.uk!newsengine.sol.net!207.172.3.44.MISMATCH!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!newsfeed.atl!news4.mco.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Masked Phrogg <erexshun@bellsouth.net> Newsgroups: comp.security.firewalls,bellsouth.net.security,comp.dcom.xdsl,comp.dcom.modems.cable Subject: Re: Cuervo, I disagree: ShareSniffer Released Organization: Stiffies Reply-To: group Message-ID: <mdjg9tovop2fb15fnf6d3a253fa60ecpe2@4ax.com> References: <3A966412.9336DCD8@mynetwatchman.com> <jtvl6.1306$aA5.364833@typhoon2.ba-dsg.net> <97656j$d8f$2@news.panix.com> <WqBl6.3899$S25.55097@typhoon.sonic.net> <976pnb$jon$2@news.panix.com> <FeCl6.3919$S25.55117@typhoon.sonic.net> <teud9t44k6igkb6q4dknv3sdjienfg2glb@4ax.com> <37El6.3929$S25.55141@typhoon.sonic.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 27 Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:17:20 -0800 NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.61.99.123 X-Trace: news4.mco 983049499 208.61.99.123 (Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:18:19 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:18:19 EST