🚀 go-pugleaf

Thanks for the input, but I have no need for your software. I have not
"inflected" myself with MS, (I am a stock holder) I want to  receive the
replies, just not Bills ramblings. Just because I don't want to listen to
Bill does not mean I do not want to read what others have said, or block out
a whole domain because of 1 rotten apple. Too many people use filters like
that with a knee jerk reaction, it's like swatting a fly with a
sledgehammer, overkill.
"Wotan" <wotan@lart.com> wrote in message
news:8bh6d0$bis$1@nnrp03.primenet.com...
> In article <OXVB4.27464$MZ2.386544@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com>,
> WalterS <walter-salvatore1@home.com> proved mental
> competance is not required to access the Internet by posting:
>
> >"Bill" has been posting in dozens of non security related groups for
weeks
> >making accusations on several unrelated software packages. You are the
one
> >who should do your research before replying to what is clearly a subject
you
> >know nothing about.
> >I have already kill filtered "Bill", but you cannot filter out the
replies
> >to his posts. Again, you should think before you reply.
>
> This seems like the appropriate place for an old comment:
>
> Get a real newsreader
>
> Any rn based newsreader can nail replies to post from nitwits, as well as
> the nitwit.  Just requires a little thought.
>
> Since you have inflected yourself with Micro$oft junk, look at
> www.nfilter.com.  Since Bill is the only person I've seen posting from
> that domain, you shouldn't have much trouble creating a basic dropfilter
> to eliminate his postings and anyone who responds to him.
> --
> To generalize is to be an idiot.
> -- William Blake