Article View: comp.security.firewalls
Article #41Re: Hardware Firewall for Co-Location
From: Bart Verweijen
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 06:28
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 06:28
33 lines
2544 bytes
2544 bytes
Dan, You should take netscreen into consideration (www.netscreen.com). A cheap hardware based firewall that does VPN and NAT and some other interesting stuff. They come out pretty good in recent tests, specially what speed is concerned... HTH, Bart "dan" <dan@cordblood.com> wrote in message news:a39a7f40.0106121624.2961c3f9@posting.google.com... > I am looking for a hardware based firewall for my companies > co-location. We have around 10 servers all running websites, > databases, or email. We need a firewall that will allow us to vpn > from the office and edit the servers as if they were part of our local > network. Also, we would like to have all the servers on internal IPs > and have the firewall route certain WAN IPs to the correct local > machine. > > I have been looking at the Watchguard PRO and SOHO, the SonicWall > SOHO2/50user and XPRS2, and the NOKIA IP110 and IP330. All seem to do > the trick, the main requirements are the one VPN connection and the > ability to route or NAT serveral IPs to certain local boxes. The > firewall can not cost more than 5g but lower cost will make the sale > much easier. I am worried that the SOHO appliances will not be able > to handle the bandwidth, number of users, or not be configurable > enough to allow for these routes. > > any help you could give would be great > > thanks > dan
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<cKDV6.4$yk2.694@nreader1.kpnqwest.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!npeer.kpnqwest.net!nreader1.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<a39a7f40.0106121624.2961c3f9@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f922c,d46d96a344260dd9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf922c,public X-Google-Thread: f4ad3,d46d96a344260dd9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4ad3,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-12 23:28:25 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!npeer.kpnqwest.net!nreader1.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Bart Verweijen" <bart.verweijen[NOJUNK]@tijd.com> Newsgroups: comp.security.firewalls,be.comp.internet References: <a39a7f40.0106121624.2961c3f9@posting.google.com> Subject: Re: Hardware Firewall for Co-Location Lines: 35 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: <cKDV6.4$yk2.694@nreader1.kpnqwest.net> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 06:28:24 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.49.19.36 X-Complaints-To: abuse@Belgium.EU.net X-Trace: nreader1.kpnqwest.net 992413704 213.49.19.36 (Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:28:24 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:28:24 MET DST Organization: KPNQwest customer news service