🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.security.firewalls
Article #41

Re: Hardware Firewall for Co-Location

#41
From: Bart Verweijen
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 06:28
33 lines
2544 bytes
Dan,

You should take netscreen into consideration (www.netscreen.com). A cheap
hardware based firewall that does VPN and NAT and some other interesting
stuff. They come out pretty good in recent tests, specially what speed is
concerned...

HTH,
Bart

"dan" <dan@cordblood.com> wrote in message
news:a39a7f40.0106121624.2961c3f9@posting.google.com...
> I am looking for a hardware based firewall for my companies
> co-location.  We have around 10 servers all running websites,
> databases, or email.  We need a firewall that will allow us to vpn
> from the office and edit the servers as if they were part of our local
> network.  Also, we would like to have all the servers on internal IPs
> and have the firewall route certain WAN IPs to the correct local
> machine.
>
> I have been looking at the Watchguard PRO and SOHO, the SonicWall
> SOHO2/50user and XPRS2, and the NOKIA IP110 and IP330.  All seem to do
> the trick, the main requirements are the one VPN connection and the
> ability to route or NAT serveral IPs to certain local boxes.  The
> firewall can not cost more than 5g but lower cost will make the sale
> much easier.  I am worried that the SOHO appliances will not be able
> to handle the bandwidth, number of users, or not be configurable
> enough to allow for these routes.
>
> any help you could give would be great
>
> thanks
> dan
Technical Details
Message-ID: <cKDV6.4$yk2.694@nreader1.kpnqwest.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!npeer.kpnqwest.net!nreader1.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <a39a7f40.0106121624.2961c3f9@posting.google.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f922c,d46d96a344260dd9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf922c,public
X-Google-Thread: f4ad3,d46d96a344260dd9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4ad3,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-12 23:28:25 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!npeer.kpnqwest.net!nreader1.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Bart Verweijen" <bart.verweijen[NOJUNK]@tijd.com>
Newsgroups: comp.security.firewalls,be.comp.internet
References: <a39a7f40.0106121624.2961c3f9@posting.google.com>
Subject: Re: Hardware Firewall for Co-Location
Lines: 35
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID: <cKDV6.4$yk2.694@nreader1.kpnqwest.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 06:28:24 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.49.19.36
X-Complaints-To: abuse@Belgium.EU.net
X-Trace: nreader1.kpnqwest.net 992413704 213.49.19.36 (Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:28:24 MET DST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:28:24 MET DST
Organization: KPNQwest customer news service