🚀 go-pugleaf

OT, fu-s to poster.

In message <aPNo6.62$9c6.4458@typhoon.sonic.net>, John Navas 
<spamfilter@navasgrp.dublin.ca.us> writes
>[POSTED TO comp.dcom.modems.cable; PLEASE REPLY THERE]
>
>In <spCknULaDto6EAXo@crowfam.org.uk>, Jim Crowther
><abuse.lockdown@dngs.crowfam.org.uk> wrote:
>
>>In message <SJyo6.30$9c6.2628@typhoon.sonic.net>, John Navas
>><spamfilter@navasgrp.dublin.ca.us> writes
>>>[POSTED TO comp.dcom.modems.cable; PLEASE REPLY THERE]
>>>
>>>In <tXZEYOi2UZo6EA0g@crowfam.org.uk>, Jim Crowther
>>><abuse.lockdown@dngs.crowfam.org.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In message <99Pn6.1260$2w3.12315@typhoon.sonic.net>, John Navas
>>>><spamfilter@navasgrp.dublin.ca.us> writes
>>>>>[POSTED TO comp.dcom.modems.cable; PLEASE REPLY THERE]
>>>>>
>>>>[huge snip]
>>>>
>>>>Why did you not set follow-ups then?
>>>>
>>>>Posted in c.s.f, fu-s set.
>>>
>>>???
>>>
>>>[Newsgroups and follow-ups restored]
>>>
>>"Please respect cross-posting" would have made more sense.  I don't take
>>c.d.m.c, and see no reason to reply just to that ng.
>>
>>Totally OT, fu-s to poster.
>
>No offense, but you seem badly confused.  The article to which you 
>replied <news:99Pn6.1260$2w3.12315@typhoon.sonic.net> was cross-posted 
>to
>
>comp.security.firewalls,bellsouth.net.security,comp.dcom.xdsl,comp.dcom.modems.cable 
  and no follow-ups were set.
>
Then why ask for "replies" (i.e. follow-ups, this is UseNet folks) to go 
to c.d.m.c, without setting them.

If you had done, there would have been no follow-up from me and no 
confusion.

If you wanted the cross-posting to continue, why make any comment at 
all.

-- 
Jim (Cruncher) Crowther                      "It's MY computer"
*               It's our turn to help pchelp                  *
*                  <http://pchelpers.org>                     *
*    <http://www.cozmikshirts.co.uk/rooms/pchelpers.shtml>    *