🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.security.firewalls
Article #77

Re: IPIP (IP Protocol 94) Probe?

#77
From: Chad
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 01:49
44 lines
2806 bytes
ipchains packets will be forwarded, but others that don't explicitly use a
protocol number would be a problem.  Although I suppose it wouldn't be too
hard to do a getprotobyname(), :)


"Lawrence Baldwin" <baldwinl@mynetwatchman.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.153d631b483152ec9896a2@news2.mia.bellsouth.net...
> [This followup was posted to comp.security.firewalls and a copy was sent
to the cited author.]
>
> FYI,
>
> I also scanned the entire ~100,000 records in the myNetWatchman
database...the ONLY protocolIDs in
> there are 6 (TCP), 17 (UDP), and 1 (ICMP).
>
> Since MNW is fed by *many* different firewalls (e.g. SonicWall, IPChains,
etc...) I can only assume
> that they're not logging these kind of events either.  (Unless Chad coded
the myNetWatchman
> PerlAgent to discard these???)
>
> lb.
> In article <slrn9d75jf.qu3.hal@localhost.localdomain>, hal@burgiss.net
says...
> > On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 19:14:14 -0400, Lawrence Baldwin
> > <baldwinl@mynetwatchman.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >Here was a pretty bizzare probe received today:
> > >
> > >http://www.mynetwatchman.com/kb/security/research/ipip.htm
> > >
> >
> > Ineteresting. I was just wondering how much stuff does get under the
> > radar screen. I just noticed some funny stuff, and if anyone out there
> > is really familiar with Linux tcp handling, this is what has me curious:
> >
>
>
> --
> Lawrence Baldwin
> Baseline your FastAccess Connection:
http://www.mynetwatchman.com/perfwatch/beta.htm
> Automatic Port Scan Reporting: http://www.mynetwatchman.com/vision.htm
Technical Details
Message-ID: <r7d0b9.6uj.ln@adsl-78-249-101.mia.bellsouth.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!freenix!isdnet!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.atl.bellsouth.net.MISMATCH!newsfeed.atl!news1.atl.POSTED!adsl-78-249-101.mia.bellsouth.net!nobody
References: <MPG.153d5dd2434544c19896a0@news2.mia.bellsouth.net> <slrn9d75jf.qu3.hal@localhost.localdomain> <MPG.153d631b483152ec9896a2@news2.mia.bellsouth.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f922c,36dd554aa7cf6f1b
X-Google-Attributes: gidf922c,public
X-Google-Thread: 10090f,36dd554aa7cf6f1b
X-Google-Attributes: gid10090f,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-04-10 19:14:03 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!freenix!isdnet!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.atl.bellsouth.net.MISMATCH!newsfeed.atl!news1.atl.POSTED!adsl-78-249-101.mia.bellsouth.net!nobody
From: "Chad" <1wag11nerch1@bellsouth.net>
Newsgroups: comp.security.firewalls,bellsouth.net.security
References: <MPG.153d5dd2434544c19896a0@news2.mia.bellsouth.net> <slrn9d75jf.qu3.hal@localhost.localdomain> <MPG.153d631b483152ec9896a2@news2.mia.bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: IPIP (IP Protocol 94) Probe?
Lines: 46
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID: <r7d0b9.6uj.ln@adsl-78-249-101.mia.bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 21:49:45 -0400
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.78.249.101
X-Trace: news1.atl 986955006 216.78.249.101 (Tue, 10 Apr 2001 22:10:06 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 22:10:06 EDT