Article View: comp.security.misc
Article #103Re: Pleasure.com mystery solved.
From: Lyndon Nerenberg
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 01:37
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 01:37
19 lines
1348 bytes
1348 bytes
kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan (KD1HZ)) writes: > The mere fact that the NIC has no place on their IP-address request > form (template INTERNET-NUMBER) indicates to me that a machine on the > internet need not have a NIC-assigned domain name. Conversely, the mere fact that the NIC has no place on their domain name application form for an IP number indicates to me that a machine on the internet need not have a NIC assigned IP address. How thoroughly bizarre! I set up lots of unconnected networks. Everyone of them has a registered IP network. The turnaround on processing the IP registration (via CA*net) was about 30 minutes, inclusive of uucp email forwarding delays. I really don't understand what the big deal is? It can't be because you're lazy, as you have plenty of energy to post ... --lyndon VE6BBM/VE6TCP
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<112@ampr.ab.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!yale!gumby!destroyer!ubc-cs!alberta!canada!lyndonReferences:
<3157@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <1992Jul29.215824.16932@anomaly.sbs.risc.net> <1992Aug01.175721.7875@anomaly.sbs.risc.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!yale!gumby!destroyer!ubc-cs!alberta!canada!lyndon From: lyndon@ampr.ab.ca (Lyndon Nerenberg) Newsgroups: comp.security.misc Subject: Re: Pleasure.com mystery solved. Summary: Don't be a butthead! Message-ID: <112@ampr.ab.ca> Date: 6 Aug 92 01:37:57 GMT References: <3157@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <1992Jul29.215824.16932@anomaly.sbs.risc.net> <1992Aug01.175721.7875@anomaly.sbs.risc.net> Organization: Boycott AT&T! Lines: 19