Article View: comp.security.misc
Article #234Re: Pleasure.com mystery solved.
From: Warner Losh
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 20:15
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 20:15
25 lines
1573 bytes
1573 bytes
In article <1992Jul29.215824.16932@anomaly.sbs.risc.net>, kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan (KD1HZ)) writes: >atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil (Randall Atkinson) writes: >> The DDn Network Information Center is the ONLY official organisation >>that can grant or delegate responsibility for domain names. >Do you have the law which deligates them this authority? Do you have the "law" that states that you must have a unique IP address? What? No Law? What a totally LAME and BOGUS argument. There are many good techincal reasons for each machine to have its own IP address, just as there are many good technical reasons to properly register the domain via the correct channels. It is in numerous RFC's that you ****MUST**** get your domain registered with the NIC, or their delegated representive. In the case of the .COM part of the tree, the NIC has not delegated that authority, so you ****MUST**** register the name with them. To think otherwise is just flat out wrong. Warner -- Warner Losh imp@Solbourne.COM Interview Horror Story #882: "It's pretty informal around here. Thursdays are clothing optional.."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bs7xLv.8qy@solbourne.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stan!impReferences:
<3157@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <1992Jul29.215824.16932@anomaly.sbs.risc.net> <1992Jul30.053413.27574@nntp.uoregon.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.security.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stan!imp From: imp@solbourne.com (Warner Losh) Subject: Re: Pleasure.com mystery solved. Message-ID: <Bs7xLv.8qy@solbourne.com> Keywords: n Organization: Solbourne, User Interface Group References: <3157@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <1992Jul29.215824.16932@anomaly.sbs.risc.net> <1992Jul30.053413.27574@nntp.uoregon.edu> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 20:15:29 GMT Lines: 25