🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <johnson.725124138@trwacs> johnson@trwacs.fp.trw.com (Steve Johnson) writes:
>breinhar@rams.srg.af.mil (Bob Reinhardt) writes:

Actually, none of the stuff below is what I said, if you're going
to use my name in an article at least include part of my text :)

Anyway, I forgot about the Motorola NES.  It may also be 
worth looking at it.  But, for the cost and its features
it is a high end product.  If all you need to do is automate
a system of mail polling and light file transfer then it
would be overkill. -- I still recommend looking at
the AT&T Model 1910 Type 1 STU-III for meeting the below
requirement -- but, Gary's question nnow needs to be
"how much and what kind of traffic do I need to pass, blah,
blah, blah?"  Judging from the fact that he was originally
looking at using STU-III serial port and assuming he's talking
about a Sectel 1500 (most people are), I think he only needs
the lower bandwidth and not the NES overkill.

----Bob Reinhardt

>
>
>>In article <murakami.9@hac2arpa.hac.com>, murakami@hac2arpa.hac.com (Gary A. Murakami) writes:
>>|> I have a requirement for secure (DOD Secret) data communications between
>>|> two sites.  Having been away from the market for while I don't know
>>|> what is currently available.  Using STU-III serial port is an option
>>|> but if there is something better (same ease of operations but maybe
>>|> faster data rates or designed solely for data comm) then I would be
>>|> interested in knowing about them.
>>|> ----
>>|> Gary Murakami       |  murakami@hac2arpa.hac.com
>>|> Hughes Training Inc.|  murky@hti.hac.com
>>|> West Covina, Calif. |
>
>>-- 
>  Motorola has a network encryption system that you might want to look at.
>
>------- Any views expressed are those of myself and not my employer. --------
>Steven C. Johnson, WB3IRU / VK2GDS      |