🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.security.misc
Article #753

Re: Future OS virus immunity.

#753
From: Scott Dorsey
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 14:31
20 lines
1389 bytes
In article <eronald.725752239@ruble> eronald@fml.tuwien.ac.at (Edmund Ronald) writes:
>
> I am a Paris based computer-interest writer, and I need info about current
>trends on making operating systems virus-resistent. Could people tell me 
>what the lines of research are?

Viruses aren't a real problem in any system that has memory protection and
any way to prevent users from directly writing into system space.  In such
a system, a user would be able to destroy his own area, but wouldn't be
able to touch the OS.

There was a lot of research in the sixties on memory protection systems,
and most modern OS designs use some degree of per-process protection of
core and disk.

Unfortunately the two major microcomputer operating systems are still in
the early 60's level of technology.  This is a marketing problem, not
a technological one.  If people refused to use junk like MS-DOS and Mac OS,
viruses would be almost nonexistant.
--scott
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1hv07gINN3mn@rave.larc.nasa.gov>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.larc.nasa.gov!grissom.larc.nasa.gov!kludge
References: <eronald.725752239@ruble>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.larc.nasa.gov!grissom.larc.nasa.gov!kludge
From: kludge@grissom.larc.nasa.gov (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: comp.security.misc
Subject: Re: Future OS virus immunity.
Date: 31 Dec 1992 14:31:12 GMT
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center and Reptile Farm
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <1hv07gINN3mn@rave.larc.nasa.gov>
References: <eronald.725752239@ruble>
NNTP-Posting-Host: grissom.larc.nasa.gov