🚀 go-pugleaf

In article 3491@nic.csu.net, oleg@gd.cs.csufresno.edu () writes:
>In article <q50qgdg@dixie.com> jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond) writes:
>>strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) writes:
>>
	<stuff about keystroke monitoring notice deleted>
>
>Huh? If I work for company X, X automatically has full rights to read
>my mail or search my home? Or maybe only if it officially warns me
>about this on it's front entrance? :). 
>
>Oleg

No, and that's clearly not what the notice is saying.  If you work for company X,
and use their equipment for whatever reason (notice many companies clearly state
*anything* done using their equipment/software/other resources is their
property, like it or no), the company has a right to make sure what you are doing
is legal and ethical.  If you don't like this type of policy, the simple answer
is to not use someone else's machine.

---
                __
           /  /   \
          /  /    /
   /     /  /    /
  /_____/  /____/

John de la Garrigue                              ||  Phone:  619/546-6192
Senior Unix System Administrator                 ||  Pager:  619/375-0500
Site Manager                                     ||  E-mail: jd@c3ot.saic.com
Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)  ||  

My views are not necessarily those of my employer, the US government,
or anyone else for that matter.