🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Bz9DB1.LHq@avalon.nwc.navy.mil> jd@parcival.nwc.navy.mil writes:
>In article 3491@nic.csu.net, oleg@gd.cs.csufresno.edu () writes:
>>In article <q50qgdg@dixie.com> jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond) writes:
>>>strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) writes:
>>>
>	<stuff about keystroke monitoring notice deleted>
>>
>>Huh? If I work for company X, X automatically has full rights to read
>>my mail or search my home? Or maybe only if it officially warns me
>>about this on it's front entrance? :). 
>>
>>Oleg
>
>No, and that's clearly not what the notice is saying.  If you work for company X,
>and use their equipment for whatever reason (notice many companies clearly state
>*anything* done using their equipment/software/other resources is their
>property, like it or no), the company has a right to make sure what you are doing
>is legal and ethical.  If you don't like this type of policy, the simple answer
>is to not use someone else's machine.
>

Do traceroute to my host and think how fun a life would be if an owner of each
gateway would capure our packets to ensure that out use of Internet is legal and
ethical.

Oleg