Article View: comp.security.unix
Article #136Re: improved (?) security by requiring full path for commands issued by root?
From: bob
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:12
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:12
34 lines
2457 bytes
2457 bytes
Christer Palm wrote: > > It's probably easier to make sure that you have a "secure" PATH before > starting to execute commands. > At this level, you should also probably check the following before > running a command: > > - That the command is in fact owned by root > - That the command itself and each directory in the command path is > writable only by root > Well, I wrote a nice little perl script to do this, thinking the script would be simple (which it was, actually), with the following results (which aren't simple): Many commands on both linux and solaris are owned by other than root, users such as news, uucp, bin to name a few. And on solaris many are writable by group, groups being similar to the preceding. I suspect that these users cannot login (second field in /etc/shadow entry is '*') but I'm not sure of this. So is this safe or what? Where do I go from here? > And, hey - there are shells that, AFAIK, do this for you, since this is > a requirement in C2 environments. In AIX, for example, you have the > restricted shell. Know of any likje this for linux or solaris? Thanx for the help. - Bob
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3A8C1C0A.CAB78DC1@none.for.me.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!supernews.com!216.227.56.88.MISMATCH!telocity-west!TELOCITY!newsrump.sjc.telocity.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<3A822606.E06E411E@none.for.me.com> <3A82E4A9.AE6F278B@nogui.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10952f,2a5221006d4e0ad9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10952f,public X-Google-Thread: 10e732,2a5221006d4e0ad9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e732,public X-Google-Thread: 1133d0,2a5221006d4e0ad9 X-Google-Attributes: gid1133d0,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-15 10:12:28 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!supernews.com!216.227.56.88.MISMATCH!telocity-west!TELOCITY!newsrump.sjc.telocity.net!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3A8C1C0A.CAB78DC1@none.for.me.com> From: bob <bob@none.for.me.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.security.unix,alt.os.security,cern.security.unix Subject: Re: improved (?) security by requiring full path for commands issued by root? References: <3A822606.E06E411E@none.for.me.com> <3A82E4A9.AE6F278B@nogui.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 34 X-Trace: MzQgTm9BdWhoVXNlciBURVBPQ0lUWS1SWUFEWVJTIDIxNi4yMjcuMTIuMTkzICBUaHUsIDE1IEZ5!YiAyLDAxIDEwOjEyOi43IFBPVA== X-Abuse-Info: Please forward ALL headers when reporting abuse. X-Complaints-To: abuse@telocity.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:12:27 PST Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:12:26 -0600