Re: SSN and new baby

Thread View: comp.society.privacy

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by M. Adams/StarOwl Sat, 09 Jan 1993 23:38

#308

Author: M. Adams/StarOwl
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 23:38

16 lines
1290 bytes

Hans Lachman <lachman@netcom.com> writes:

>It would seem reasonable to decline their offer to set your kid up with an
>SSN since he won't need one until he starts working.

According to the IRS, if you wish to claim a child over age 1 as a
dependent for tax purposes, that child *must* have a SSN.

True, the kid doesn't need a SSN for hirself, but the parent(s)/guardian(s)
might need the kid to have a SSN.....

-- 
Michael D. Adams	      | Bigotry not being founded on reason cannot be
StarOwl@uiuc.edu	      | removed by argument.  -- Samuel Johnson
an692@anon.penet.fi	      | There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned 
NBCS: B1f+t-w+g+k++s+me+h-qv  | lies, and statistics.  -- Benjamin Disraeli

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads