Re: worries about privacy could tone down success of caller ID

Thread View: comp.society.privacy

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by Richard M. Hartman Tue, 19 Jan 1993 13:58

#318

Author: Richard M. Hartman
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1993 13:58

21 lines
1365 bytes


I don't really see what the problem is.  If you have a peephole
in the door, you can see me when I knock before letting me in.

If I cover the peephole with my thumb, you cannot see me.

It is then your option to not open the door.

What is the problem with having both Caller-ID (peephole),
and Caller-ID-Blocking (thumb)?

		-Richard Hartman
		hartman@ulogic.COM

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"If we do not succeed, we risk failure."			-D. Quayle
[Moderator's Note:  Would anyone out there be willing to put together a
FAQ on caller-id?  This faq should be bias free and mention arguements
for and against caller-id, line blocking, per call blocking, ANI vs
Caller-id, etc.  ._dennis ]

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads