Article View: comp.society
Article #246Re: net.views -- computer crime
From: David Barker-Plummer
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 18:06
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 18:06
57 lines
3171 bytes
3171 bytes
In article <1992Oct02.211324.12465@utoday.com> wagner@utoday.com (Mitch Wagner) writes: MW> Do you consider computer crime to be a threat to your system? MW> This question is being posted to gather responses for a regular MW> opinion column in OPEN SYSTEMS TODAY called "net.views." MW> By posting a response to this topic, you are granting MW> permission for OPEN SYSTEMS TODAY to publish your response. A MW> compilation of the responses to this post will be posted here about MW> two weeks from today. MW> Please include in your response your name, your employer, your job MW> title, and location. Or, if you identify yourself as a student, please MW> give your class standing (freshman, sophomore, junior, senior, grad), MW> the school and its location. Please also provide a telephone number MW> where you can be reached during the daytime (overseas readers note: MW> that's daytime in North America). MW> Please be brief; try to limit your responses to two screens MW> (24x80) of text, not including headers and other administrivia. MW> Thanks! MW> -- mitch w. MW> -- MW> Mitch Wagner, senior editor, Open Systems Today MW> 2353 Massachusetts Ave. Suite 47, Cambridge, MA 02140 MW> wagner@utoday.com (617)547-8485 CIS:70212,51 GEnie:MITCH.WAGNER MW> For subscription information, please call 516/562-5882 So let me get this straight. You are soliciting information from the net.community at no cost to yourself, so that you can sell this information as part of your magazine? This sounds to me like a commercial use of the net, which (as I understand it) is prohibited by the rules of NSFnet which forms part of the Internet on which this post is distributed. Even if it weren't prohibited, don't you think that asking people to work for you without compensation is a tad unreasonable? -- Dave [Moderator's comment: I approved this posting despite the semi-commercial nature of the OPEN SYSTEMS appeal because a promise to post result to the net was included. Also, net users will be able to make their own conclusions about the response rate and copyright issues - if their are few responses, will it be due to unwillingness to "work for nothing" or simply a reflection of low interest in this forum? If results are not posted as promised, it will be the last such posting from OPEN SYSTEMS. --- Greg Welsh, moderator, comp.society Internet: Socicom@american.edu Bitnet: Socicom@auvm.bitnet ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<PLUMMER.92Oct10130653@nutmeg.cs.swarthmore.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!kithrup!hoptoad!pacbell.com!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!yoyo.aarnet.edu.au!arnie.systems.sa.gov.au!mars.lands.sa.gov.au!plummerReferences:
<1992Oct02.211324.12465@utoday.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!kithrup!hoptoad!pacbell.com!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!yoyo.aarnet.edu.au!arnie.systems.sa.gov.au!mars.lands.sa.gov.au!plummer From: plummer@cs.swarthmore.edu (David Barker-Plummer) Newsgroups: comp.society Subject: Re: net.views -- computer crime Message-ID: <PLUMMER.92Oct10130653@nutmeg.cs.swarthmore.edu> Date: 10 Oct 92 18:06:53 GMT References: <1992Oct02.211324.12465@utoday.com> Sender: news@cc.swarthmore.edu (USENET News System) Organization: Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA Lines: 57 Approved: socicom@auvm.american.edu 10/13/92 14:12:46 In-Reply-To: wagner@utoday.com's message of 2 Oct 92 21:13:24 GMT Nntp-Posting-Host: nutmeg.cs.swarthmore.edu