Article View: comp.society
Article #369Re: 2nd CFV and VOTE ACK: comp.society.development
From: Dave Taylor
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1991 09:02
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1991 09:02
24 lines
1403 bytes
1403 bytes
Rob Kling notes:
> There is (unfortunately) so little discussion on comp.society that I'd
> think that issues of computing in developed countres would actually give
> the board a little needed life!
I concur with Rob that there is distressingly little traffic, but I
am at a bit of a loss as to what can be done to remedy this. One
would think that discussion of the impact of technology on society
would be a rather sweeping, all inclusive topic, but the actual
discussion that takes place seems rather minimal, especially given
the reputed distribution and readership numbers.
As the editor/moderator, I would certainly be most willing to
entertain and experiment with different ideas and solutions, and
indeed, perhaps the best thing to do is for me to obsolete myself
and us make comp.society unmoderated?
Thoughts? Suggestions?
-- Dave Taylor
Intuitive Systems
Mountain View, California
taylor@limbo.intuitive.com or {uunet!}{decwrl,apple}!limbo!taylor
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1961@limbo.Intuitive.Com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!limbo!taylorShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!limbo!taylor From: taylor@intuitive.com (Dave Taylor) Newsgroups: comp.society Subject: Re: 2nd CFV and VOTE ACK: comp.society.development Message-ID: <1961@limbo.Intuitive.Com> Date: 30 Apr 91 09:02:46 GMT Sender: taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com Lines: 24 Approved: taylor@Limbo.Intuitive.Com