Re: Soap Software, Stolen Software, Sojourn

Article View: comp.society

Article #674

#674

From: Julian E Gomez
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1988 16:16

11 lines
885 bytes

Michael J. Farren writes:

> ...no such studies were felt to be necessary - it was accepted without
> data that copy protection was necessary, even with the full knowledge
> that our games were being cracked within days of their release.

Having thought about this for a few days, I must admit that I am
still baffled.  At the risk of starting a "discussion", can you
explain the reasoning behind that conclusion?

Julian Gomez

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1718@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!bbn!rochester!cornell!batcomputer!pyramid!hplabs!hplabsz!taylor

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!bbn!rochester!cornell!batcomputer!pyramid!hplabs!hplabsz!taylor
From: julian@riacs.edu (Julian E Gomez)
Newsgroups: comp.society
Subject: Re: Soap Software, Stolen Software, Sojourn
Message-ID: <1718@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM>
Date: 16 Mar 88 16:16:16 GMT
Sender: taylor@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM
Organization: Research Institute for Advanced Computer Science
Lines: 11
Approved: taylor@hplabs