Article View: comp.society
Article #813Re: Manipulation of Courtroom Evidence
From: Mitchell Wyle
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1990 19:02
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1990 19:02
11 lines
905 bytes
905 bytes
> Any question on the quality of the picture is a question about the > quality of the witness. Don't you have to sign photos, tapes, videos, etc.? If it is doctored, the person who signed it goes to jail for purgery, no? It was always possible to air-brush or retouch photos. Computers don't make it that much easier. It was always possible to synthesize taped testimony. Since all this stuff needs a person behind it, computers won't hurt or hinder the current courtroom system. Mitchell
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<442@limbo.Intuitive.Com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!limbo!taylorShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!limbo!taylor From: wyle@inf.ethz.ch (Mitchell Wyle) Newsgroups: comp.society Subject: Re: Manipulation of Courtroom Evidence Message-ID: <442@limbo.Intuitive.Com> Date: 22 Feb 90 19:02:31 GMT Sender: taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com Organization: ETH Zurich Lines: 11 Approved: taylor@Limbo.Intuitive.Com