Article View: comp.society
Article #817Re: Manipulation of Courtroom Evidence
From: Bruce Perens
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1990 19:22
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1990 19:22
21 lines
1350 bytes
1350 bytes
Walter Nirenberg writes: > .. investigating the impact of recent computer graphics technology > advances on the use of video and photographs as courtroom evidence. There was an apocryphal story going around the NYIT Computer Graphics Laboratory when I started working there in 1982. At that time we had a 24-bit paint system with NTSC scanners and high-resolution photo output, similar to what you can do on a PC today. It was said that a manager who wanted to void a traffic ticket had one of our painters alter a photograph to put a tree in front of a stop sign. The forgery wasn't good enough to fool the judge, who told the manager to pay up or go to jail. Now this could just be an entertaining story that someone there cooked up, especially since this particular manager was sort of unpopular with the research staff. I have no evidence that it ever happened. Bruce Perens ucbvax!pixar!bp
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<446@limbo.Intuitive.Com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!limbo!taylorShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!limbo!taylor From: bp@pixar.com (Bruce Perens) Newsgroups: comp.society Subject: Re: Manipulation of Courtroom Evidence Message-ID: <446@limbo.Intuitive.Com> Date: 22 Feb 90 19:22:05 GMT Sender: taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com Organization: Pixar -- Marin County, California Lines: 21 Approved: taylor@Limbo.Intuitive.Com