Article View: comp.society
Article #821Re: Manipulation of Courtroom Evidence
From: Tony Buckland
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1990 19:46
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1990 19:46
10 lines
961 bytes
961 bytes
There's a thread in this discussion that says more or less "yeah, but you have to sign it and face possible perjury charges". This won't work for two classes of people; perpetrators who would face severe enough penalties if convicted that they have in their judgement nothing to lose; and the amoral types who would coldly calculate the odds of being caught and the rewards of getting away with it, and then cheerfully perjure themselves every day of the week if the numbers came out right. Tony
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<459@limbo.Intuitive.Com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!limbo!taylorShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!limbo!taylor From: buckland@cheddar.cc.ubc.ca (Tony Buckland) Newsgroups: comp.society Subject: Re: Manipulation of Courtroom Evidence Message-ID: <459@limbo.Intuitive.Com> Date: 24 Feb 90 19:46:24 GMT Sender: taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com Organization: UBC Computing Centre, Vancouver, B.C., Canada Lines: 10 Approved: taylor@Limbo.Intuitive.Com