Article View: comp.soft-sys.andrew
Article #1346Re: PLANEMASK_ENV
From: Zalman Stern
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 18:50
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 18:50
46 lines
2858 bytes
2858 bytes
In article <wepP50m00Woi5W80ZR@andrew.cmu.edu> rr2b+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU (Robert Andrew Ryan) writes: > In basics/x/xgraphic.c there is some code ifdefed on PLANEMASK_ENV. > Does anyone know what this is for, and if it is used by anyone? > > Thanks for any info, > -Rob Ryan > Andrew Consortium Really really vague memories gradually come back to me... (I didn't write this code though I've tried to find bugs in it.) ATK used to do certain operations by setting the planemask to the xor of the foregound and background pixel values and then xor'ing in the foreground color. This allows you to get something like standard xor rubberbanding on a color display where you are only using two colors. (I think that at one time Xgraphic wired the planemask to this xor'ed value and left it that way until you changed the fore and back colors.) There are a few problems with this: first actually using the planemask turned out to be dog slow on certain servers. Second, there were bugs in using the planemask on other servers. (Yet another X11 feature that you didn't want to use because it didn't get performance and QA attention.) Thirdly, this scheme completely falls apart when there are more than two colors in a window. If I recall, PLANEMASK_ENV at one time set things up to do xor mode drawing by xor'ing with the xor of the fore and back colors instead of setting the planemask. I'm not sure which direction the flag went. Also, I think other stuff has been added under PLANEMASK_ENV that probably doesn't have anything to do with the above. The last time I dealt with ATK (~two years ago), I had to compile it with different values of PLANEMASK_ENV for my 1 bit NCD and my 8 bit Magnum. And there were still a few bugs either way. I'd suggest figuring out what the correct X11 like thing to do is, riping out the PLANEMASK_ENV code (and anything else that looks suspect) and rewritting it. (Understand that at the time xgraphic was written, X11 theory and practice were relatively undeveloped. People actually believed GC's and Windows were dirt cheap for example.) The above ramble may be pure fiction. If you'd like a more direct source, talk to Andy Palay or Mark Sherman. -- Zalman Stern zalman@adobe.com (415) 962 3824 Adobe Systems, 1585 Charleston Rd., POB 7900, Mountain View, CA 94039-7900 "Yeah. Ask 'em if they'll upgrade my shifters too." Bill Watterson
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct9.185048.7057@adobe.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!olivea!decwrl!adobe!usenetReferences:
<wepP50m00Woi5W80ZR@andrew.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!olivea!decwrl!adobe!usenet From: zstern@adobe.com (Zalman Stern) Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.andrew Subject: Re: PLANEMASK_ENV Message-ID: <1992Oct9.185048.7057@adobe.com> Date: 9 Oct 92 18:50:48 GMT References: <wepP50m00Woi5W80ZR@andrew.cmu.edu> Sender: usenet@adobe.com (USENET NEWS) Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated Lines: 46