Re: Andrew under Solaris 2.x ?

Article View: comp.soft-sys.andrew

Article #1924

Back to comp.soft-sys.andrew Previous Next

#1924

From: Vance Shipley
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 08:54

10 lines
829 bytes

In article <16288@auspex-gw.auspex.com> guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris) writes:

>	3) the net result of such a port may, if done right, amount not
>	   just to a Solaris 2.x port, but to a generic SVR4 port.

This would be nice :).  I'd dearly love to have Andrew on my SCO ODT boxes.

-- 
Vance Shipley 
vances@xenitec.on.ca         vances@switchview.com         vances@ltg.uucp

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan09.085413.2896@xenitec.on.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!xenitec!vances

References: <1993Jan8.015653.23570@telematics.com> <AfHPUx4Gf0478JPmYw@athena.mit.edu> <16288@auspex-gw.auspex.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.andrew
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!xenitec!vances
From: vances@xenitec.on.ca (Vance Shipley)
Subject: Re: Andrew under Solaris 2.x ?
Organization: XeniTec Consulting, Kitchener, Ontario, CANADA
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 08:54:13 GMT
Message-ID: <1993Jan09.085413.2896@xenitec.on.ca>
References: <1993Jan8.015653.23570@telematics.com> <AfHPUx4Gf0478JPmYw@athena.mit.edu> <16288@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message