🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Article #178

Re: state feedback instead of output feedback?

#178
From: Glen Springle
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 1997 00:00
30 lines
1625 bytes
Klaus Bernhard wrote:
> 
> Why would one use state feedback ( and therewith Kalman filtering)
> instead of output feedback, when I can feed my controller with the
> latter one directly instead of estimating the states with an observer
> and so on...?
> 
> Warum benutzt man Zustandsr�ckf�hrung (und ben�tigt einen
> Kalman-Filter) anstelle der Ausgangsr�ckf�hrung, wenn ich letztere
> direkt in den Regler geben kann anstelle der gesch�tzten Zust�nde
> usw...?
> 
> Klaus
> --
> Klaus Bernhard
> Institut f�r Kraftfahrwesen Aachen      ika      Department of
> Automotive Engineering
> RWTH Aachen
> University of Technology Aachen, Germany
> 
> Please remove the '_no'-string from my
> email adress if you reply directly
> klausb@ika.rwth-aachen.de

In some mechanical systems, you can't always install a sensor where you
want to measure the output you need.  Sometimes the best that can be
achieved is sensors with coupled state values.

Glen
Technical Details
Message-ID: <33EB5DA7.19BD@ise.bc.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <01bca24b$0be53970$991a8286@pclabor04>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 106e3f,74a98e7849920317
X-Google-Attributes: gid106e3f,public
X-Google-Thread: 107905,74a98e7849920317
X-Google-Attributes: gid107905,public
X-Google-Thread: 104540,74a98e7849920317
X-Google-Attributes: gid104540,public
From: Glen Springle <springle@ise.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: state feedback instead of output feedback?
Date: 1997/08/08
Message-ID: <33EB5DA7.19BD@ise.bc.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 262907321
References: <01bca24b$0be53970$991a8286@pclabor04>
Organization: International Submarine Engineering Ltd.
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab,sci.engr.control,fido.ger.control