Article View: comp.software.licensing
Article #43Re: Moving back the system clock
From: James Davies
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 20:37
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 20:37
16 lines
1349 bytes
1349 bytes
In article <1992Oct6.162735.7140@ampex.com> leepeng@ampex.com (Peng Lee) writes: > > The best software license is for someone (Bill Gate) to convince > the CPU maker (intel) to have one register contains a unique ID for > each CPU. (32 bits PROM programmed at the end of CPU testing cycle.) Of course, then AMD will make a clone of the CPU with a program-writable ID register, then Intel will sue AMD, Microsoft will refuse to sell software for AMD clones, the Justice Department will sue Intel and Microsoft collectively for antitrust violations, and everyone will blame everyone else for the mess. Besides, hackers will just dummy out the "fetch-ID" instruction in their copy of the program and give it to their friends (after infecting it with a virus ;-). Simple solutions are simple to circumvent.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct9.203758.16525@craycos.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!copper!aspen.craycos.com!jrbdReferences:
<JEFF.92Oct4154740@dsp.sps.mot.com> <Bvo9HE.3F5@solbourne.com> <1992Oct6.162735.7140@ampex.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!copper!aspen.craycos.com!jrbd From: jrbd@craycos.com (James Davies) Newsgroups: comp.software.licensing Subject: Re: Moving back the system clock Message-ID: <1992Oct9.203758.16525@craycos.com> Date: 9 Oct 92 20:37:58 GMT Article-I.D.: craycos.1992Oct9.203758.16525 References: <JEFF.92Oct4154740@dsp.sps.mot.com> <Bvo9HE.3F5@solbourne.com> <1992Oct6.162735.7140@ampex.com> Organization: Cray Computer Corporation Lines: 16