🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sources.apple2
Article #68

v01_ADM_11: More on archiving and Bitnet chomping

#68
From: Jonathan A. Chandross
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 1990 22:57
57 lines
2832 bytes
Submitted-by: jac
Posting-number: Volume 1, Administrivia: 11

In this issue:
	Bitnet chomping of characters
	categorizing by machines a package runs on

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Bruce Kahn <bkahn@archive.webo.dg.com>

[ Re: Bitnet chomping of certain characters ]

  An alternative to using uuen/decode is to use the xxen/decode program that
is also available from most any c.s.u archive.  It uses a smaller set of
characters (so will probably be a little larger; no hard numbers either way)
BUT you would not have to worry about character munging by BITNET gateways.
Another alternative to this is simply provide a way to convert the munged
character (the ~ or ^; I forget which) back to its original character (^ or
~ respectively).  I may be a bit off but this is the only munging Ive ever
heard of.

[ I've gotten some mail about this from Bitnet users who claim that
  they have no control over file munging.  If the only hacking
  necessary is to quote either the ~ or the ^, I guess I retract
  my objections.  Trigraphs, however, are right out. ]

[ Re: A Read.Me to indicate what machines/OS a package runs on ] 

  The submitting author should be required to at least tell you what the
package does or requires in a note to the archive maintainers.  This could be
made into a READ.ME file if none is aleady provided...

[ I was intending to enforce such a policy.  Nothing will be posted without
  some indication of what it does and what it runs on. ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)

The problem with categorising by machines is that most programs should
run on most machines. How about lang/type[/machine]/name/ver/part??.
Only include the /machine part for stuff that *is* machine specific.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To get something posted to comp.sources.apple2, send it to:
	Internet: jac@paul.rutgers.edu
	UUCP: rutgers!paul.rutgers.edu!jac

Please mark comments that are not to be posted with "Not for Posting".
Otherwise, I often can't tell.


Jonathan A. Chandross
Internet: jac@paul.rutgers.edu
UUCP: rutgers!paul.rutgers.edu!jac
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Sep.9.18.57.46.1990.26980@paul.rutgers.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!jarthur!bridge2!mips!dimacs.rutgers.edu!aramis.rutgers.edu!paul.rutgers.edu!jac

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!jarthur!bridge2!mips!dimacs.rutgers.edu!aramis.rutgers.edu!paul.rutgers.edu!jac
From: jac@paul.rutgers.edu (Jonathan A. Chandross)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.apple2
Subject: v01_ADM_11:  More on archiving and Bitnet chomping
Message-ID: <Sep.9.18.57.46.1990.26980@paul.rutgers.edu>
Date: 9 Sep 90 22:57:46 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 57
Approved: jac@paul.rutgers.edu