Article View: comp.sources.bugs
Article #184Re: pcomm 1.1 patch 9
From: Rick Richardson
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1989 11:51
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1989 11:51
21 lines
1404 bytes
1404 bytes
In article <11200006@fthood> egray@fthood.UUCP writes:
>
>I mailed the Pcomm v1.2 distribution package to Rich Salz (the moderator
>of comp.sources.unix) on the 4th of Feb 89. I have also mailed him the
>4 patches as they came out. He has acknowledged that he does indeed
>have the code, and that it is "in the queue".
With that kind of delay "in the queue", it seems to me that you ought
to send Rich a completely patched Pcomm v1.2.
I just can't see why comp.sources.unix should publish a program with
known patches (and the headaches they create) unless the patches
"cross in the mail", so to speak. These patches couldn't have crossed
in the mail, even if one of the links was doing 0.1 baud!
--
Rick Richardson | Looking for FAX software for UNIX ?????? mention
PC Research,Inc.| WE'RE SHIPPING your
uunet!pcrat!rick| Ask about FaxiX - UNIX Facsimile System (tm) FAX #
(201) 389-8963 | Or JetRoff - troff postprocessor for the HP {Laser,Desk}Jet
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1989Sep22.115114.12248@pcrat.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!pcrat!rickReferences:
<132728@<1989Sep16> <11200006@fthood>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!pcrat!rick From: rick@pcrat.uucp (Rick Richardson) Newsgroups: comp.sources.bugs Subject: Re: pcomm 1.1 patch 9 Message-ID: <1989Sep22.115114.12248@pcrat.uucp> Date: 22 Sep 89 11:51:14 GMT References: <132728@<1989Sep16> <11200006@fthood> Reply-To: rick@pcrat.UUCP (Rick Richardson) Organization: PC Research, Inc., Tinton Falls, NJ Lines: 21