Re: perl 3.0 patch #12

Article View: comp.sources.bugs

Article #2359

#2359

From: Tom Neff
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 1990 03:41

17 lines
1199 bytes

In article <1990Mar5.200203.25581@trigraph.uucp> "John J. Chew" <poslfit@gpu.UTCS.UToronto.CA> writes:
>Problems encountered while upgrading from patch 8 to patch 12 of
>Perl 3.0 under A/UX 1.1 using cc:
>
>- The optimizer warns that some optimizations are lost due to table
>  overflow when compiling eval.c and toke.c.  The generated code appears
>  to be correct even if presumably suboptimal :-).

This also happens on V/386 3.2, but I didn't report it because it's
happened on every version of Perl I've ever built.  (Actually I just
get it on eval.c now that I think of it.)

I suppose it would be nice to cut the label count down.  May not be
possible though...
-- 
If the human mind were simple enough to understand,  =))  Tom Neff
we'd be too simple to understand it. -- Pat Bahn     ((=  tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET

Technical Details

Message-ID: <15233@bfmny0.UU.NET>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!bfmny0!tneff

References: <7241@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV> <15222@bfmny0.UU.NET> <1990Mar5.200203.25581@trigraph.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!bfmny0!tneff
From: tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.bugs
Subject: Re: perl 3.0 patch #12
Message-ID: <15233@bfmny0.UU.NET>
Date: 6 Mar 90 03:41:43 GMT
References: <7241@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV> <15222@bfmny0.UU.NET> <1990Mar5.200203.25581@trigraph.uucp>
Reply-To: tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff)
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message