Re: RN/RRN patch 50

Article View: comp.sources.bugs

Article #498

#498

From: Paul Graham
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 1990 18:02

10 lines
816 bytes

patch 50 failed on ndir.c.  fetching kit9 reveals the progression
1.3 -> 1.5 -> 1.6.  my ndir.c (patchlevel 48,49) was at 1.3 and
patch 50 wanted 1.5.

was it just a glitch that patch 50 was posted to n.s.nntp et. al.
but not patch 49?

-- 
pjg@acsu.buffalo.edu / rutgers!ub!pjg / pjg@ubvms (Bitnet)
opinions found above are mine unless marked otherwise.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <47439@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!acsu.buffalo.edu

References: <4354@lib.tmc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!acsu.buffalo.edu
From: pjg@acsu.buffalo.edu (Paul Graham)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.bugs
Subject: Re: RN/RRN patch 50
Message-ID: <47439@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>
Date: 24 Nov 90 18:02:44 GMT
References: <4354@lib.tmc.edu>
Sender: news@acsu.Buffalo.EDU
Organization: University at Buffalo
Lines: 10
Nntp-Posting-Host: urth.acsu.buffalo.edu

Reply to Parent Message