Article View: comp.sources.bugs
Article #606Re: smail-2.5 fix for domain gateway routing
From: Greg A. Woods
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 1991 19:52
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 1991 19:52
49 lines
2861 bytes
2861 bytes
In article <1991Jan24.034941.3360@Sandelman.OCUnix.On.Ca> mcr@Sandelman.OCUnix.On.Ca (Michael Richardson) writes:
> In article <1991Jan23.061830.19719@watdragon.waterloo.edu> gamiddleton@watdragon.waterloo.edu (Guy Middleton) writes:
> >In article <1991Jan14.234354.8055@eci386.uucp> woods@eci386 (Greg A. Woods) writes:
> > Here's the problem, as told by Mark Moraes <moraes@cs.toronto.edu>:
> > > When looking up "foo.xenitec.on.ca", first look it up as is.
> > > If matched, replace the %s in the path with username. Else,
> > > remove the first domain component (foo) and look up
> > > ".xenitec.on.ca". If that matches, replace the %s in the path
> > > with THE FULL DOMAIN NAME AND username. I.e:
> > >
> > > lsuc!utai!watmath!foo.xenitec.on.ca!user
> > > NOT
> > > lsuc!utai!watmath!user
>
> lsuc!utai!watmath!xenitec!foo.xenitec.on.ca!user should be what is
> produced.
>
> In some other article someone else (gamiddleton?) said:
> > I think it would be nicer if the result was
> >
> > lsuc!utai!watmath!xenitec!user
And someone else also suggested:
lsuc!utai!watmath!xenitec!foo.xenitec.on.ca!user
> And (gamiddleton?) continues:
> > That way, I could use smail on watmath to decide that foo.xenitec.on.ca was a
> > local connection, instead of having to embed that information in my
> > sendmail.cf file.
>
> If you aren't the gateway, you shouldn't have to do anything.
Ah, but if I understand the map entries correctly, watmath *IS* the
gateway!
I'm not sure if it should be the former, (i.e. path!domain!user) or
the latter (i.e. path!gate!domain!user). The pathalias output
contains only the path segment, and Mark's comments indicate the
former is correct (i.e. smail inserts domain!user). It seems to me
that the gateway machine should indeed be the one which decides how to
route into the domain. Certainly pathalias can't insert the gateway
machine into the output (i.e. path!watmath!xenitec!%s), since there's
no saying the gateway can be reached by '!' addressing.
--
Greg A. Woods
woods@{eci386,gate,robohack,ontmoh,tmsoft}.UUCP ECI and UniForum Canada
+1-416-443-1734 [h] +1-416-595-5425 [w] VE3TCP Toronto, Ontario CANADA
Political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible-ORWELL
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jan30.195213.12815@eci386.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!fts1!latour!ecicrl!eci386!woodsReferences:
<1991Jan14.234354.8055@eci386.uucp> <1991Jan23.061830.19719@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <1991Jan24.034941.3360@Sandelman.OCUnix.On.Ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!fts1!latour!ecicrl!eci386!woods From: woods@eci386.uucp (Greg A. Woods) Newsgroups: comp.sources.bugs,comp.mail.uucp,can.uucp,can.usrgroup Subject: Re: smail-2.5 fix for domain gateway routing Message-ID: <1991Jan30.195213.12815@eci386.uucp> Date: 30 Jan 91 19:52:13 GMT References: <1991Jan14.234354.8055@eci386.uucp> <1991Jan23.061830.19719@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <1991Jan24.034941.3360@Sandelman.OCUnix.On.Ca> Reply-To: woods@eci386.UUCP (Greg A. Woods) Organization: Elegant Communications, Inc. Lines: 49