Re: Should I use dmake?

Article View: comp.sources.d

Article #1088

#1088

From: Systems Staff
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 1990 22:26

23 lines
1327 bytes

In article <4034@rossignol.Princeton.EDU>, tr@samadams.princeton.edu (Tom Reingold) writes:
> There is a package in comp.sources.misc called dmake which is supposed
> to run on several operating systems.  I use UNIX and DOS.  Currently I
> am happy with NDMAKE by Don Kneller.  It runs under DOS and it emulates
> just about all of UNIX's make.
> 
> Is there a reason I should switch to DMAKE?  It would take some trouble
> to download and compile.

I have never seen sources for ndmake; if it is only a binary
distribution that would be a good enough reason to switch.

 Thos Sumner       Internet: thos@cca.ucsf.edu
 (The I.G.)        UUCP: ...ucbvax!ucsfcgl!cca.ucsf!thos
                   BITNET:  thos@ucsfcca

 U.S. Mail:  Thos Sumner, Computer Center, Rm U-76, UCSF
             San Francisco, CA 94143-0704 USA

I hear nothing in life is certain but death and taxes -- and they're
working on death.

#include <disclaimer.std>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3229@ucsfcca.ucsf.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!fernwood!apple!bionet!agate!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!cca.ucsf.edu!root

References: <4034@rossignol.Princeton.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!fernwood!apple!bionet!agate!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!cca.ucsf.edu!root
From: root@cca.ucsf.edu (Systems Staff)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: Should I use dmake?
Summary: Sources?
Message-ID: <3229@ucsfcca.ucsf.edu>
Date: 5 Nov 90 22:26:54 GMT
References: <4034@rossignol.Princeton.EDU>
Organization: Computer Center, UCSF
Lines: 23

Reply to Parent Message