Article View: comp.sources.d
Article #1280Recent posting of wcl in comp.sources.x bad?!
From: Vidiot
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 1990 21:58
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 1990 21:58
15 lines
1032 bytes
1032 bytes
While tearing apart, actually right before, I discovered that the posting of the wcl sources seems to be in error. First off, many of the postings were repeated and parts 3 and 4 appear to be duplicates of 1 and 2, respectively. Parts 3 and 4 start out for those parts and then all of a sudden change to parts 1 and 2, right there in the header. Oh, and the posting says 11 parts, when 12 show up. Needless to say, I don't trust the posting and am dumping the whole thing into the bit bucket, awaiting arrival of a posting that is correct. -- harvard\ ucbvax!uwvax!astroatc!ftms!brown rutgers/ INTERNET: spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!ftms!brown
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<13@ftms.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwvax!astroatc!vidiot!ftms!brownShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwvax!astroatc!vidiot!ftms!brown From: brown@ftms.UUCP (Vidiot) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Recent posting of wcl in comp.sources.x bad?! Message-ID: <13@ftms.UUCP> Date: 26 Dec 90 21:58:34 GMT Reply-To: brown@ftms.UUCP (Vidiot) Distribution: na Organization: Vidiot's Other Hangout Lines: 15