Article View: comp.sources.d
Article #134Re: nn and 80286 processors
From: Kim F. Storm
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 1989 16:45
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 1989 16:45
18 lines
1355 bytes
1355 bytes
In article <1415@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu> mcdaniel@uicsrd.csrd.uiuc.edu (Tim McDaniel) writes: >0,1,0 is indeed incorrect; the compiler has to know that the 0s are >pointers and not just ints (since null pointers are permitted to have >a size and/or internal representation different than an int 0). I fully agree, but I was fooled by the following wording in the curses manual: "The simplest call would be setupterm(0,1,0) which uses all the defaults", so that is what I did. I have included the various patches for the '286 in patch #4 which is scheduled for friday this week, and have fixed quite a few additional 16/32 bit inconsistencies. I don't have access the a '286 myself, but at least none of the patches can do any harm, and they may even work :-) -- Kim F. Storm storm@texas.dk Tel +45 429 174 00 Texas Instruments, Marielundvej 46E, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark No news is good news, but nn is better!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<354@texas.dk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!kth!sunic!dkuug!tidk!stormReferences:
<803@cimcor.mn.org> <1415@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!kth!sunic!dkuug!tidk!storm From: storm@texas.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: nn and 80286 processors Keywords: patches Message-ID: <354@texas.dk> Date: 5 Jul 89 16:45:22 GMT References: <803@cimcor.mn.org> <1415@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu> Organization: Texas Instruments, Denmark Lines: 18