Article View: comp.sources.d
Article #146Re: nn and 80286 processors
From: Jean-Pierre Radley
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1989 05:05
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1989 05:05
20 lines
1156 bytes
1156 bytes
In article <1415@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu> mcdaniel@uicsrd.csrd.uiuc.edu (Tim McDaniel) writes: >In article <803@cimcor.mn.org> mike@cimcor.mn.org (Michael Grenier) >writes (more or less): >> Changed arguments in call to setupterm to NULL,1,NULL from 0,1,0 in term.c... >0,1,0 is indeed incorrect >Therefore, to change 0,1,0 to NULL,1,NULL will ... be incorrect as before. >The correct fix is to cast NULL to the proper argument type, as in > (struct foobar *) NULL, 1, (struct stoat *) NULL The file already contains a #define NONE, which is NULL cast to a character pointer. So, on my 386 box, I found that I should replace 0,1,0 by NONE,1,NONE -- Jean-Pierre Radley CIS: 72160,1341 jpr@jpradley.UUCP
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<10180@dasys1.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!bionet!ames!hc!lanl!cmcl2!phri!cooper!dasys1!jprReferences:
<803@cimcor.mn.org> <1415@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!bionet!ames!hc!lanl!cmcl2!phri!cooper!dasys1!jpr From: jpr@dasys1.UUCP (Jean-Pierre Radley) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: nn and 80286 processors Message-ID: <10180@dasys1.UUCP> Date: 11 Jul 89 05:05:23 GMT References: <803@cimcor.mn.org> <1415@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu> Reply-To: jpr@dasys1.UUCP (Jean-Pierre Radley) Organization: TANGENT Lines: 20