Article View: comp.sources.d
Article #1704Re: v01INF1: Status - Status of comp.sources.reviewed
From: Dan Bernstein
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1991 21:48
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1991 21:48
14 lines
1047 bytes
1047 bytes
Should the referenced message (originally in comp.sources.reviewed as well) have been cross-posted here? I don't think so, but I'm not sure. (I know it should have had Followup-To: comp.sources.d.) In article <1991Apr11.022612.2522@rick.doc.ca> csr@calvin.doc.ca (Andrew Patrick) writes: > There has been a lot of activity "behind-the-scenes" among the reviewers > in getting the newsgroup setup. Of course. So all the people who voted for the group are now getting a group that may only loosely correspond to what was proposed at first. This isn't a flame, just an observation. ---Dan
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9418:Apr1121:48:4291@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!hsdndev!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstndReferences:
<1991Apr11.022612.2522@rick.doc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!hsdndev!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: v01INF1: Status - Status of comp.sources.reviewed Message-ID: <9418:Apr1121:48:4291@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> Date: 11 Apr 91 21:48:42 GMT References: <1991Apr11.022612.2522@rick.doc.ca> Organization: IR Lines: 14