Article View: comp.sources.d
Article #1743Re: v01INF1: Status - Status of comp.sources.reviewed
From: Lars Wirzenius
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1991 15:57
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1991 15:57
17 lines
1395 bytes
1395 bytes
In article <1991Apr14.232818.15851@athena.mit.edu>, jik@athena.mit.edu (Jonathan I. Kamens) writes: > In article <6787:Apr1420:38:3991@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>, brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes: > |> > There are currently two or > |> > three alternatives to comp.sources, c.s.r is just another option. > |> > |> That's one of its biggest problems. > > I've never understood this attitude. Why is giving people more options a > problem? Doesn't c.s.r accepts and review sources to non-Unix systems as well as for Unix systems? This alone is a good enough reason to give the group a try, IMHO (or do there exist moderated, reviewing source groups for most systems? I don't think I've seen any, but I'm often wrong anyway). -- Lars Wirzenius wirzenius@cc.helsinki.fi
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Apr15.155743.5996@cc.helsinki.fi>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!news.funet.fi!hydra!cc.helsinki.fi!wirzeniusReferences:
<scs.671464069@hela.iti.org> <16390:Apr1305:56:2091@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1991Apr14.232818.15851@athena.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!news.funet.fi!hydra!cc.helsinki.fi!wirzenius From: wirzenius@cc.helsinki.fi (Lars Wirzenius) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: v01INF1: Status - Status of comp.sources.reviewed Message-ID: <1991Apr15.155743.5996@cc.helsinki.fi> Date: 15 Apr 91 15:57:43 GMT References: <scs.671464069@hela.iti.org> <16390:Apr1305:56:2091@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1991Apr14.232818.15851@athena.mit.edu> Organization: University of Helsinki Lines: 17