Article View: comp.sources.d
Article #1754Re: v01INF1: Status - Status of comp.sources.reviewed
From: Dan Bernstein
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1991 02:14
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1991 02:14
19 lines
1352 bytes
1352 bytes
In article <1991Apr15.164926.6468@athena.mit.edu> jik@athena.mit.edu (Jonathan I. Kamens) writes: > If you do not deny that, then how can you say that the potential in > comp.sources.reviewed is only to provide "marginally" faster service than > comp.sources.unix. Tsk. You seem to be arguing that since you had a posting delayed, everyone must have had postings delayed, and so anything faster than eight months is a huge improvement. I just don't think comp.sources.unix is so slow, and I invite you to survey other people who have actually posted to the group rather than continuing to chat with me about our theories. Until you do that, truce? > then > the service provided by comp.sources.reviewed is significantly more than > "marginally" faster than the service provided by comp.sources.reviewed. Ahem. :-) ---Dan
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<12422:Apr1602:14:1191@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rutgers!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstndReferences:
<1991Apr14.204213.12062@athena.mit.edu> <12026:Apr1512:29:4191@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1991Apr15.164926.6468@athena.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rutgers!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: v01INF1: Status - Status of comp.sources.reviewed Message-ID: <12422:Apr1602:14:1191@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> Date: 16 Apr 91 02:14:11 GMT References: <1991Apr14.204213.12062@athena.mit.edu> <12026:Apr1512:29:4191@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1991Apr15.164926.6468@athena.mit.edu> Organization: IR Lines: 19