🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <DANJ1.91Apr27033327@cbnewse.ATT.COM> Dan_Jacobson@ATT.COM writes:

| >>>>> On 25 Apr 91 02:42:17 GMT, amigo@milton.u.washington.edu (The Friend) said:
| 
| The>      I'm currently in progress on a basic text editor. If anyone
| The> can provide some source code to an editor, it'd help considerably
| The> (editors aren't easy to design).
| 
| pick up GNU Emacs from prep.ai.mit.edu

While I am an ardent GNU emacs and epoch user, I would say GNU emacs
is definately not a basic text editor, and it's internals can be
complex (trust me, I've ported it to 3 different machines, and wrote
unexec for two object file formats).  Something like mg might be
better.

I seem to remember that there articles last year about either MIT tech
reports or books from the MIT Press about the general editor design
issues.

Also, I am probably wrong, but the original article smells like a Comp
Sci homework assignment....
--
Michael Meissner	email: meissner@osf.org		phone: 617-621-8861
Open Software Foundation, 11 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, 02142

Considering the flames and intolerance, shouldn't USENET be spelled ABUSENET?