Article View: comp.sources.d
Article #1890CFV: Should SHAREWARE be posted in comp.sources.misc
From: Kent Landfield
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:17
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:17
74 lines
3957 bytes
3957 bytes
There has been an on going discussion as to whether SHAREWARE is
acceptable for posting in the group comp.sources.misc. This has
been a topic that flares up everytime that a piece of SHAREWARE
is posted to the group. I do not wish to moderate the group by
dictating policy. I would rather that the community at large
tell me what you feel is the correct direction in the matter.
I am running a vote to once and for all decide whether of not
SHAREWARE should be posted to comp.sources.misc. If you feel
that SHAREWARE is (un)acceptable then let me know via a vote.
VOTING PROCEDURE:
Send votes to: votes@sparky.sterling.com OR uunet!sparky!votes
Preferably, your message should include one of the following
lines in the body of the text:
I vote YES for SHAREWARE in comp.sources.misc
I vote NO for SHAREWARE in comp.sources.misc
The vote will continue until Midnight, December 5, 1992. At that
time I will tally and abide by the results of the vote. A simple
majority wins.
And since someone accurately pointed out that I really should
define the terms I use... :-) The following definitions were
taken from the Jargon file.
######################## Jargon file terms ######################
:careware: /keir'weir/ n. {Shareware} for which either the
author suggests that some payment be made to a nominated charity
or a levy directed to charity is included on top of the
distribution charge. Syn. {charityware}; compare
{crippleware}, sense 2.
:crippleware: n. 1. Software that has some important functionality
deliberately removed, so as to entice potential users to pay for a
working version. 2. [Cambridge] {Guiltware} that exhorts you to
donate to some charity (compare {careware}). 3. Hardware
deliberately crippled, which can be upgraded to a more expensive
model by a trivial change (e.g., cutting a jumper).
:guiltware: /gilt'weir/ n. 1. A piece of {freeware} decorated
with a message telling one how long and hard the author worked on
it and intimating that one is a no-good freeloader if one does not
immediately send the poor suffering martyr gobs of money.
2. {Shareware} that works.
:payware: /pay'weir/ n. Commercial software. Oppose {shareware}
or {freeware}.
:postcardware: n. {Shareware} that borders on {freeware}, in that the
author requests only that satisfied users send a postcard of their
home town or something. (This practice, silly as it might seem,
serves to remind users that they are otherwise getting something for
nothing, and may also be psychologically related to real estate
"sales" in which $1 changes hands just to keep the transaction from
being a gift.)
:shareware: /sheir'weir/ n. {Freeware} (sense 1) for which the
author requests some payment, usually in the accompanying
documentation files or in an announcement made by the software
itself. Such payment may or may not buy additional support or
functionality. See also {careware}, {charityware},
{crippleware}, {guiltware}, {postcardware}, and
{-ware}; compare {payware}.
-Kent+
---
Kent Landfield INTERNET: kent@IMD.Sterling.COM
Sterling Software, IMD UUCP: uunet!sparky!kent
Phone: (402) 291-8300 FAX: (402) 291-4362
Please send comp.sources.misc-related mail to kent@uunet.uu.net.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov20.171751.25602@sparky.imd.sterling.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!kentShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d,news.groups,alt.sources.d,news.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!kent From: kent@sparky.imd.sterling.com (Kent Landfield) Subject: CFV: Should SHAREWARE be posted in comp.sources.misc Message-ID: <1992Nov20.171751.25602@sparky.imd.sterling.com> Summary: You decide. Keywords: Vote, shareware, sources.misc Reply-To: votes@sparky.sterling.com Organization: Sterling Software Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:17:51 GMT Lines: 75 X-Md4-Signature: 5681a3678f25529a25bdea4c3155445d