🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1ejd2mINN2uv@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU> randall-joshua@yale.edu (Joshua Randall) writes:

   To aid us in our decision, could you inform those who do not read the "sources"
   group what the charter of that group says about appropriate posts?

If you don't read it, why are you concerned about its content?

   This is fine, but calling this is CFV is *not* OK!  For one thing, I haven't
   seen *any* discussion of this on news.groups, let alone a formal RFD.

It's not a new group proposal, nor was it labeled a Call For Votes.
It's a referendum by the moderator of an existing group on a question
internal to the group.

This poll does not violate any Usenet guidelines and I don't
understand why you are making a big deal out of it.  If you want to be
controversial, try stating an opinion on *.synth.  :)
-- 
Ed McGuire                   1603 LBJ Freeway, Suite 780
Systems Administrator/       Dallas, Texas 75234
 Member of Technical Staff   214/620-2100, FAX 214/484-8110
Intellection, Inc.           <ed@intellection.com>