🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <19379@rpp386.cactus.org> jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F Haugh II) writes:
> >    Wont-Work-With: non-POSIX, non-BSD
> Which is the same as
> Works-With: POSIX Compliant BSD Systems.

But I thought the idea was to have at least some semi-standard keywords,
not a mishmash of ``compliant'' and ``system'' and so on created anew
for each package.

> The set of environments that the software is likley to execute on is
> far smaller than the set of environment that it will execute on.

That's not important. What's important is the size of the *description*
of the set of unsupported environments.

How about a compromise:

   Requires: POSIX & BSD-derived, or Interactive, or 3B2
   But-Wont-Work-With: SunOS<4.0.3, Convex UNIX<8.0

(Note that we have to distinguish between BSD and BSD-derived.)

---Dan