Article View: comp.sources.d
Article #2145Re: Discussion of Common TeX.
From: Bruce Langdon
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1987 06:43
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1987 06:43
17 lines
1526 bytes
1526 bytes
In article <11628@brunix.UUCP>, kbb@nancy (Karl Berry.) writes:
> Could we please move discussion of Common TeX source code,
> ...., and so on to comp.sources.d or some
> other more appropriate newsgroup? comp.text is supposed to
> be for discussion of text processing, typesetting, ...
Exactly. And it's done with computer programs. Such as those that
Monnari creates. Common TeX, among other things, is EXACTLY the
sort of thing that I hope to learn about when I read comp.text.
(I have my own list of things that appear here that I don't need.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Langdon L-472 langdon@lll-lcc.ARPA
Physics Department "langdon#bruce%d@lll-mfe.ARPA"
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Livermore, CA 94550 (415) 422-5444
UUCP: ..{ihnp4,qantel,ucdavis,pyramid,styx,topaz}!lll-lcc!langdon
..{gymble,ll-xn,seismo}!lll-crg!lll-lcc!langdon
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<548@lll-lcc.aRpA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!lll-lcc!langdonReferences:
<11628@brunix.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!lll-lcc!langdon From: langdon@lll-lcc.aRpA (Bruce Langdon) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: Discussion of Common TeX. Message-ID: <548@lll-lcc.aRpA> Date: Wed, 21-Jan-87 01:43:09 EST Article-I.D.: lll-lcc.548 Posted: Wed Jan 21 01:43:09 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 21-Jan-87 21:54:57 EST References: <11628@brunix.UUCP> Organization: Lawrence Livermore Labs, Livermore Ca Lines: 17 Summary: comp.text is fine for Common TeX