🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sources.d
Article #5028

Kits for new sites (Was: Re: regarding patch level of patch)

#5028
From: Kent Landfield
Date: Sat, 20 May 1989 17:57
39 lines
2636 bytes
In <3eCX02wo28gL01@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> paf@uts.amdahl.com
# Perhaps some sort of "kit" with the commonly requested programs could
# be send out once every few months? 1 megabyte or so a year would probably be
# sufficient. My canidates would be news, patch, uudecode/encode, arc (or
# equivilant), binhex, shar. In short the programs necessary to access and
# extract news programs/articles.

In article <246@nlgvax.UUCP> hans@nlgvax.UUCP (Hans Zuidam) writes:
# Some sort of "kit" would be *really* usefull. It would allow a new site
# to be up and running with the correct software in no time. However, posting
# such a kit every x months would be a gross waste of bandwidth assuming that
# most sites are running the correct software.
#
# When I was a (sort of) system manager at another site a couple of years
# ago it was a hell of a problem just to get started. I did not know if I
# had the correct software, saw people talking about patches I did not have,
# didn't know if I needed them and so on. When you start with a Usenet
# connection you generally do not even know what you *do* need. If you
# help a new site to get online you have to dig software from all corners
# of your filesystems ;-) and forget half. This takes a lot of time for both
# parties involved.

I totally agree. A kit does need to be created. The kit list could be a
list of all the software that should be distributed to each new site on
the net. The new site would receive the kit list and the associated software
from the site that it was connecting to. My objection is to having the 
software designated on the kit list transmitted through everyone's sites.

The software associated with the kit list is already available on most
sites. If a kit list was created, the admins of the sites helping a new
site "connect to the net" could use the kit list as a checklist to assure
that the new site has all the "standard tools".

			-Kent+
---
Kent Landfield               UUCP:     kent@ssbell
Sterling Software FSG/IMD    INTERNET: kent%ssbell@uunet.uu.net
1404 Ft. Crook Rd. South     Phone:    (402) 291-8300 
Bellevue, NE. 68005-2969     FAX:      (402) 291-4362
Technical Details
Message-ID: <482@ssbell.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ssbell!kent
References: <3eCX02wo28gL01@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <1730@fig.bbn.com> <246@nlgvax.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ssbell!kent
From: kent@ssbell.UUCP (Kent Landfield)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Kits for new sites (Was: Re: regarding patch level of patch)
Message-ID: <482@ssbell.UUCP>
Date: 20 May 89 17:57:08 GMT
References: <3eCX02wo28gL01@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <1730@fig.bbn.com> <246@nlgvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: kent@ssbell.UUCP (Kent Landfield)
Organization: Sterling Software, FSG-IMD, Bellevue, NE.
Lines: 39