🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <141@dsinc.DSI.COM> syd@dsinc.UUCP (Syd Weinstein) writes:
>In article <25224@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> wisner@mica.Berkeley.EDU (Bill Wisner) writes:
>:Flame them to a smoldering crisp when they don't.
>Rather than causing us to ignore you entirely, how about having the
>moderators of the respective groups announce their willingness to
>have the patches to us existing source coordinators.  I have seen
>a lot of posting about things, but have heard nothing official.
>

OK, consider this an official statement.  I will gladly accept patches from
authors or maintainers of sources that have been or will be posted to
comp.sources.games.  I will also give patches higher priority in posting
than new stuff.  I don't care how long after the original source posting
you wait before sending me a patch or patches.  I believe that timeliness
is often most important if a "major" bug prevents lots of people from
compiling or running a program.

As an aside, I also plan to start using the "Patch-To:" auxillary header
on new patch files submitted for posting.

	-Bill Randle
	Moderator, comp.sources.games
	Tektronix, Inc.
	games@saab.CNA.TEK.COM