🚀 go-pugleaf

In article ... jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II) writes:
> In article ... peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
> >I think it might be a good idea to move these small-machine groups to a
> >new comp.micro second-level hierarchy.

> Better still, I think it would be a good idea to move these small-machine
> groups to a new first-level hierarchy so I can quit carrying them.

Who says you can't quit carrying them anyway? Go ahead and drop them
right now. I'm sure that putting !comp.binaries in your sys file will
save you gobs of wasted space.

I mean, really, nobody is *forced* to get all of any hierarchy, even comp,
and whether or not you like small machines they *are* reasonable comp
groups.

It's obvious that some work needs to be done on the top level of the
hierarchy, but is this the place? How about a 'humanities' or 'technical'
set of groups?
-- 
 _--_|\  Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. <peter@ficc.uu.net>.
/      \
\_.--._/ Xenix Support -- it's not just a job, it's an adventure!
      v  "Have you hugged your wolf today?" `-_-'