Article View: comp.sources.d
Article #605Re: Proposing a new "shareware.*" news heirarchy
From: The Super User
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 1990 07:18
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 1990 07:18
15 lines
1362 bytes
1362 bytes
So take the raw data and publish your findings. I'll mail it to you. The comments about "yes, but with restrictions" were more along the lines of "jeez, if it's GOTTA BE on the network, it should be a in a group that I don't have to carry. " Period. Sure, there's some interpretations of this, but that's closer (in my opinion) to a NO than to a YES. So yea, I'm lumping the "no", and "yes with restrictions into one. Your email about my posting as root, funny enough, wasn't the one I was responding to, though I used a couple of your words. Check it out for yourself. Anyways, I'm hardly an unbiased person in this. So why don't you do a workup on the raw data and publish it as a disinterested party? In other words, if you're unhappy with what I posted, I'll flood your mailbox and let you do the work. Fair enough?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1378@polari.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!sumax!polari!rootReferences:
<5002@macom1.UUCP> <514@limbo.Intuitive.Com> <35243@watmath.waterloo.edu> <1376@polari.UUCP> <11021@sequoia.execu.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!sumax!polari!root From: root@polari.UUCP (The Super User) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: Proposing a new "shareware.*" news heirarchy Message-ID: <1378@polari.UUCP> Date: 16 Mar 90 07:18:52 GMT References: <5002@macom1.UUCP> <514@limbo.Intuitive.Com> <35243@watmath.waterloo.edu> <1376@polari.UUCP> <11021@sequoia.execu.com> Reply-To: root@.UUCP (The Super User) Organization: PolarServ, Seattle WA Lines: 15