🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <404@coma.UUCP> axel@coma.UUCP (Axel Mahler) writes:
>In article <210@ajfcal.UUCP> tony@ajfcal.UUCP (Tony Field) writes:
>>
>>If anyone wishes the Xenix diff's, I would be glad to email after these
>>unresolved functions are implemented.
>>
>As one of the implementors of the shape-toolkit, I'm glad to see
>that many people find our system useful, and even start to do ports
>to new platforms. However, as we continue working on shape, the version
>control system, and the underlying object management system, we have 
>a *STRONG* interest to maintain control over the toolkit's evolution.

An admirable goal.  However I think there is a big difference between
a patch and a port.  Some of us need to get it running first.

I have a keen interest in shape as it may provide a basis for resolution
of some problems I have.  Unfortunately, there seems to be no
support for us System V folks and I presently do not have the time to
tackle it myself.  

If anyone can provide the diffs to get going on System V machines, I for
one have a *STRONG* interest in getting something that I can compile and 
run.  We can discuss patches later.

Tony, my e-mail address is below.  Put me on your mailing list.

-- 
* Tom Moore                NCR Corporation  PCD-6              (513) 445-1373 *
* Consulting Analyst       1700 S. Patterson Blvd.         VOICEplus 622-1373 *
* Network Applications     Dayton, OH 45479          Tom.Moore@Dayton.NCR.COM *