🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Dec23.173641.1599@fmg.bt.co.uk> ghbr@fmg.bt.co.uk (Hossein Bagherzadeh Rafsanjani) writes:
>In article <"swan.cl.ca.438:18.11.92.14.10.47"@cl.cam.ac.uk> Michael.Hinchey@computer-lab.cambridge.ac.uk (Michael Hinchey) writes:
>
>>  rosalind@logcam.co.uk (Rosalind Barden) writes :
>
>> |When Mike states that 'lots of "ladies" attended the dinner', this is
>> |not quite accurate.
>
>> Sorry, "lots" was perhaps an exaggeration, but I was pleased that quite
>> a number of ladies did attend.
>
>> |There were few women at the conference and all those that I spoke to were
>> |angry that women can still be treated this way.
>
>> It was not only the ladies who were angry; I thin the vast majority of
>> the gentlemen at the conference felt this way too.  
>

I really can't see the point of getting ANGRY at something like this.
I think that women should be allowed to be members in exactly the same way
as men, but getting ANGRY that they aren''t is a complete and utter
waste of time.  ANGER is a self-defeating emotion and if you feel
ANGRY you won't be most effective in altering the situation.  Negative
emotions like ANGER impair your ability to solve problems or act
efficiently or effectively or think rationally.  So let's get rid
of all this pointless ANGER.

Antoni Diller