Article View: comp.specification
Article #197Against executable specifications (Re: specifying OBJ in itself)
From: Oliver Schoett
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 1990 16:00
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 1990 16:00
23 lines
1638 bytes
1638 bytes
In article <1990Oct12.172820.4771@cbnewsm.att.com> lfd@cbnewsm.att.com
(leland.f.derbenwick) writes:
> I don't know any easy answers to these problems; I now tend to see
> executable specifications as more likely part of the problem than of the
> solution.
The following paper makes a number of points against executability of
specification languages:
@Article( HJ_89,
Author= "I. J. Hayes and C. B. Jones",
Title= "Specifications are not (necessarily) executable",
Journal= "Software Engineering Journal",
Year= "1989",
Month= nov,
Pages= "330--338")
Oliver Schoett Institut f. Informatik, Technische Univ. M"unchen
Postfach 20 24 20, 8000 M"unchen 2, Germany
schoett@informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de +49 89 2105 2390
schoett%informatik.....de@ {relay.cs.net, unido.uucp, dfngate.bitnet}
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4955@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!ira.uka.de!fauern!tumuc!lan!schoettReferences:
<6470@vanuata.cs.glasgow.ac.uk> <1990Oct11.115952@julien.informatik.uni-dortmund.de> <1990Oct12.172820.4771@cbnewsm.att.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!ira.uka.de!fauern!tumuc!lan!schoett From: schoett@informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de (Oliver Schoett) Newsgroups: comp.specification Subject: Against executable specifications (Re: specifying OBJ in itself) Message-ID: <4955@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de> Date: 17 Oct 90 16:00:15 GMT References: <6470@vanuata.cs.glasgow.ac.uk> <1990Oct11.115952@julien.informatik.uni-dortmund.de> <1990Oct12.172820.4771@cbnewsm.att.com> Sender: news@lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de Organization: Inst. fuer Informatik, Technische Univ. Muenchen, West Germany Lines: 23 In-reply-to: lfd@cbnewsm.att.com's message of 12 Oct 90 17:28:20 GMT